Author: Dieter Buerssner
Date: 14:02:30 04/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 10, 2003 at 15:27:49, Drexel,Michael wrote: [much snipped] >On April 10, 2003 at 14:30:51, K. Burcham wrote: >>Chess Tiger 14.0: >>31.a4 bxa4 32.Kc3 a3 33.Bc1 a2 34.Bb2 Nxb2 35.Kxb2 a1Q+ 36.Kxa1 axb4 37.Kb2 e4 >>38.g3 Kb7 39.Kb3 Kc6 40.Kxb4 >> = (0.12) Depth: 19 00:17:52 587387kN, tb=4 >> Fritz 7 (No MMX): >>31.a4 bxa4 32.Kc3 a3 33.Bc1 a2 34.Bb2 Nxb2 35.Kxb2 axb4 >> ² (0.38) Depth: 22/47 00:38:50 2834126kN, tb=708 >The Chesstiger and Fritz pvs dont convince me at all. Why? I find the PVs rather convincing. To me it looks, they are correct for at least 8 plies (Fritz only shows 8 plies, I did not look at the later plies of Tiger, but at least a1Q+ Kxa1 seems winning). Perhaps the scores are not convincing, the PVs are - I think. My engine would probably not need years - but many hours. Regards, Dieter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.