Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: To SMP or not to SMP what's the answer?

Author: Pavel Blokhine

Date: 14:15:39 04/10/03

Go up one level in this thread


On April 10, 2003 at 15:31:04, Aaron Gordon wrote:

>On April 10, 2003 at 13:25:21, Jonas Bylund wrote:
>
>>Personally i have seen a great difference in the long run between SMP capable
>>chess engines and single processor engines, in the words of someone who have
>>dealt with both, what would you say are the pro's and con's??
>>
>>Jonas
>
>While messing with SMP machines is a bit of fun, I still prefer single cpu
>machines. I've noticed the bandwidth on all x86 SMP machines are pretty horrid
>compared to fast single cpu systems. Dual Xeon 2.8GHz gets about 2.5GB/s, my
>single AthlonXP system is pulling about 3.5gb/s. Not to mention the latency is
>pretty nasty with SMP machines.
>
>Also, there the overclockability factor. Single cpu machines tend to overclock
>much more and cost much less. Plus with a fast single cpu machine you get good
>performance all around, not in just the select few applications that support
>SMP.
>
>As far as applications go, I'm sure there are more to come.. but for RIGHT NOW,
>if you get an smp machine are you going to wait 2 years before there are enough
>SMP applications to make it worth while? By then you'll want another upgrade and
>would have wasted the SMP systems capabilities, and by then it would probably
>just get thrown in the closet or get turned into a router.
>
>I'm happy knowing my 2.5GHz XP gets 1gb/s more memory bandwidth than a dual Xeon
>system, and faster performance than a dual Xeon 2.4GHz in chess and about equal
>speeds with a P4-3.06 @ 4GHz. Not bad for an $80 cpu, $80 motherboard, $150 of
>ram, etc..
>
>
>I know SMP does have it's advantages, of course. I use a dual Celeron 400@550 in
>my server, it comes in pretty handy (plus it's just fun to mess with). IMHO
>if you're not doing strenuous tasks like massive webserver stuff, multiple game
>servers handling hundreds (or thousands) of people, cpu intensive database
>manipulation, etc, then it'd be a waste of money. For desktop stuff, playing
>games & whatnot, my vote is for a single cpu box. :)



$80 cpu, $motherboard, $150 of Ram? Where did you get such a deal? How much
would it cost me if i I want to add a 17" LCD flat panel monitor? Can you give
me more infos please?



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.