Author: Anthony Cozzie
Date: 15:48:07 04/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 13, 2003 at 18:28:37, Mike Byrne wrote: >On April 13, 2003 at 18:22:42, Anthony Cozzie wrote: > >>Honestly, I agree with Kasparov. That game was simply not worth of a brilliancy >>prize. Radjabov had a hopelessly lost position and got lucky. A brilliancy is >>supposed to be perfect play by the winner and almost-perfect play by the loser - >>this game was poor play by the winner and a blunder by the loser. It would have >>been nice if Kasparov had stated his objections more diplomatically though. >> >>anthony > > >I don't think that's the issue - I think it is the way he conducted himself >aftewards with his totally classless comments. and, if you had read more than the first 4 words of my post . . .
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.