Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: How strong is HIarcs 9 ???? with date (04/10/03)

Author: Günther Simon

Date: 10:04:43 04/14/03

Go up one level in this thread


On April 14, 2003 at 11:08:38, stuart taylor wrote:

>On April 14, 2003 at 10:24:10, Günther Simon wrote:
>
>>On April 14, 2003 at 06:02:47, enrico carrisco wrote:
>>
>>>This is a fake engine, derived from an OLD post-revision of HIARCS 7.32.  The
>>>HIARCS 9 beta engine is not named in this manner.  We use very different names
>>>for the alpha and beta engines.
>>>
>>>Mark Uniacke and I have already looked at the engine in question and it is no
>>>more than a mediocre hex-editing job.
>>
>>Even if this is an old hacked pre-7.32 version I cannot imagine
>>that Mark will be happy about such posts as they mean copyright
>>violations too.
>>I dont know if Tanya already had owned Hiarcs 7.32 before?
>>If not she got a 'free' copy of pre-H7.32 from a 'friend' like warez.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Günther
>>
>>http://home.t-online.de/home/g.simon.rgbg/
>
>But how would such a thing beat Ruffian 8-2? Hiarcs 8 is only about equal to
>Ruffian!
>S.Taylor

Hello Stuart, I think you you should ask this Enrico or Mark ;)
(Personally I think its just a statistical fluke and BTW Hiarcs 7.32
seems to be a bit underestimated especially in non blitz/bullet
time controls - I consider 15+10 as rapid like FIDE...)

Regards,
Günther



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.