Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 08:35:22 04/16/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 15, 2003 at 21:10:19, Jim Monaghan wrote: >On April 15, 2003 at 09:21:39, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>As FM ... > >>anyway, taking on e3 looks dumb. > >Hi Vincent, > >I beg to differ with your "argument" for rejecting ...Bxe3. Didn't Nimzovich >respond to Tarrasch that the beauty of a move does not lie in it's "appearance", >but in the thought behind it. Eliminating White's potentially most potent piece >as the game opens up seems logical. I explained the thought process and provided >an example continuation. Your lines to me do not seem as clear, but then I'm >only a rusty 2090 CFC ... Why give up a strong bishop versus stupid knight? Breaking open position with c5 seems better. But i find Qe6 better than Bxe3. >Cheers, >Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.