Author: Jonas Bylund
Date: 11:53:31 04/16/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 16, 2003 at 14:21:51, Gregory Owett wrote: >On April 16, 2003 at 13:36:31, Jonas Bylund wrote: > >>On April 16, 2003 at 12:21:22, Gregory Owett wrote: >> >>>Even the old Shredder 6.02 beat him easily! >>>Sh6.02 - CT15 3-1 T-20' H=64, own book, GUI F8 on P2/450Mhz >>>SH6.02 - CT15 2-0 T=40'/40+20' H=64, own book >>>I hoped better ! >> >>A word of advice, check out the excellent work of Kurt Utzinger + chess friends. >>You will find out that it is a tedious task to arrive at any conclusion as when >>it comes to strength in a chess engine. Also next time you post (hopefully more >>than 6 games!) don't forget to specify under what conditions you carried out >>your test/s i.e. time control, hardware used, ponder=on or off, what books did >>the engines use, what interface/s etc. I bet you that if you ran a 50 game match >>at 40 moves in 40 minutes between CT 15 and say Shredder 6.02 or even better 7 >>or 7.04 then people would appreciate it a lot, i know i would. >> >>Another thing, think twice before drawing conclusions based on so few games, run >>a long match at a decent (long) time control and let the result speak for >>itself. >> >>Regards >>Jonas > >What you say, I know. You are right. But it was a first test, and a first >impression. And this impression was bad. Impression doesn't want say conclusion. >Nevertheless, I'm afraid for the rest. When you put it like that it makes sense, i think that your header is the culprit here :) Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.