Author: Will Singleton
Date: 12:04:53 04/16/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 16, 2003 at 14:20:27, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On April 15, 2003 at 23:28:47, Will Singleton wrote: > >>On April 15, 2003 at 17:40:17, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On April 15, 2003 at 17:23:09, Will Singleton wrote: >>> >>>Will, >>> >>>Some programs have a very simple qsearch and simply recapture at all squares >>>where already in the normal search has been captured. Simple, easy and very >>>fast. >>> >> >>I tried that method by itself (replacing the SEE), and got a good speed boost >>along with some weird pv's. However, using (SEE || any pv captures) does solve >>this particular problem faster. Not sure if the additional nodes justify normal >>use. >> >>Will > > >how long is it taking you to see that Ne5 is ok for black? IE I spot this at >depth=11 >after a couple of seconds. At depth=10 Ne5 looks good for white. The position looks about equal, except for the aforementioned hiccup. This is with the new code, which improves but doesn't eliminate the problem. 8 9 144 586052 Ne5 Qb4 a5 Bb6 Qd6 Bxa5 Qxb4 cxb4 Rxa5 bxa5 Nxc4 9 223 391 1542971 Ne5 Qb4 Nxc4 Qxc4 Rd5 Nb3 Rh5 f4 10 -14 753 3096159 Ne5 Qb4 Ng4 g3 a5 Bb6 Qd6 Bxa5 Qxb4 Bxf7 Nxf7 cxb4 11 5 1813 7592375 Ne5 Qb4 Ng4 g3 Nxc4 Qxc4 Ne5 Nb5 Qb7 Qe2 Nf3 Kh1 Bh3 Will
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.