Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: wanted: perspectives on the future of chess

Author: Louis Fagliano

Date: 09:12:24 04/17/03

Go up one level in this thread


On April 17, 2003 at 00:35:03, andrew tanner wrote:

>   I was wondering if people have come to the general consensus that computers
>are increasingly becoming unbeatable and consequently the game may soon be
>losing interest and support except for the famed "man v machine" contest. Of
>course there will always be enthusiastic support from hobbyists, I am referring
>specifically about the masses.
>   Here is a typical scenario: A child plays his best friend and wins, then
>proceeds to return home to his playstation where he gets clobbered even on the
>easy levels by the tireless machine. Being a precocious youngster, he concludes
>that "the only way to win is not to play" - excerpted from the movie "war Games"


Here's one scenario:  People will still want to play chess and there will still
be professional GM's even if computers become invincible, but they will be used
as the authoritative reference of analysis.  A chess informant or an ECO volume
in the year, say, 2020 will no longer have the symbols ± or ∞ at the end
of an opening line but instead an evaluation number and program name such as
Fritz 15, -0.31.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.