Author: F. Jermann
Date: 07:56:13 04/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 17, 2003 at 21:15:07, Robin Smith wrote: >On April 17, 2003 at 16:59:14, Robert Pawlak wrote: > >>If you want flexibility and power, then ChessAssistant is your best bet. Don't >>forget that the analysis process encompasses more than simply having a computer >>blunder check a game. >> >>Bob (www.chessassistance.com) > >Bob, > >I disagree. ChessAssistant is a fine product, but ChessBase has many excellent >analysis features that ChessAssistant cannot match. I use ChessBase for analysis >almost exclusively. And for beginners or intermediate players even a playing >program like Fritz does an excellent job. It really depends on what kind of >analysis the poster wants to do. For most situations my choice would be a >chessbase product. > >Robin I have both products (Fritz 8 + Chessbase 8, ChessAssistant 7.1) and I am think that the analysis features of CA 7.1 are BY FAR superior to the CB products. What feature do you miss in CA? Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.