Author: Peter Berger
Date: 13:29:44 04/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 17, 2003 at 21:46:17, Robin Smith wrote: >On April 16, 2003 at 17:19:46, Peter Berger wrote: > >> 8/7p/8/1pP1kp2/1P1n1P2/P3pP2/4B2P/5K2 b - - 0 1 bm Kd5 >> >>Kd5 draws, Kxf4 loses. I really like this one - proving the loss after Kxf4 is >>not trivial but to find Kd5 is still very doable for a human amateur player - a >>positional decision. > >I agree that proving Kxf4 loses is is not trivial. Are you sure it is even true? Yes, I am pretty sure. I have analyzed it in some detail together with one of our electronic friends. Do you disagree and see a potential safing line you want to discuss? >Anyway, I agree Kd5 is a safer way to draw. > >>Fritz is very impressive here and finds it in under a minute on a PIII1200 >>notebook. >> >>Source: > >Thanks for providing the source. I much prefer that than when I see it left out. You're welcome. Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.