Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:22:24 04/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 18, 2003 at 03:50:38, Drexel,Michael wrote: >On April 17, 2003 at 22:12:47, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On April 16, 2003 at 18:38:32, Drexel,Michael wrote: >> >>>On April 16, 2003 at 17:48:25, Alan Grotier wrote: >>> >>>>Now have Fritz 5.32. Main interest is Analysis features. Have always loved F5.32 >>>>Concidering Fritz 8. Will F8 help me more then F.5.32 >>>> >>>>Alan >>> >>>That question is not so easy to answer as it might appear. >>>Depends on the position and your experience. >>>As for Analysis I recommend still Fritz 7.008 (free Fritz 7 update) >>>and Chessmaster 9000 Mentor with Selective search = 12. >>>Analysing with both programs is probably the best you can do in Windows. >>>Chessmaster is an incredible strong attacker. Fritz has more knowledge and is >>>slightly better in some endgames. >>>Maybe Chess Tiger 14 is also worth considering for Analysis. I dont know. >>> >>>It is not necessary to buy the latest versions of chessprograms for Analysis. >>>Sometimes older versions are better for that purpose. >> >>Isn't the stronger the program, the better the analysis? > >No, stronger against other engines does not at all mean its better for analysis. > >>And isn't CT15 stronger than CT14, > >We dont know > >http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?293706 >http://w1.859.telia.com/~u85924109/ssdf/list.htm >http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?293859 > >If CT15 is really stronger the gain is negligibly for Analysis. > >and Fritz 8008 stronger than Fritz 7008? > >It might get a worse SSDF rating. How can it get worse ssdf rating when Fritz8008 is not tested by the ssdf but only weaker later version that refuse to play Nxe4? Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.