Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Faster than dual Xeon 2.8GHz?

Author: Vincent Lejeune

Date: 06:47:36 04/19/03

Go up one level in this thread




On April 19, 2003 at 09:44:52, Pavel Blokhine wrote:

>On April 19, 2003 at 08:19:55, Vincent Lejeune wrote:
>
>>one more link, 11 pages, very slow server :
>>
>>http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/athlon64.html
>>
>>On April 19, 2003 at 07:46:47, Vincent Lejeune wrote:
>>
>>>No bad news this time, the opteron systems will be out the 21st of april !!
>>>
>>>http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=9039
>>>http://www.amdzone.com/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On April 19, 2003 at 01:02:15, Pavel Blokhine wrote:
>>>
>>>>On April 18, 2003 at 23:37:04, Brian Richardson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On April 18, 2003 at 21:58:06, Jonas Bylund wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>Thanks. But so far, nobody has told me if it was a faster machine than the dual
>>>>>>>Xeon 2.8Ghz...which was the thing i wanted to know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yes dual AMD 2600+ would be faster.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Jonas
>>>>>
>>>>>I have a dual AMD system and the SMP scalability efficiency is at best about
>>>>>1.7x vs 1.9x for the Intel systems, IIRC, so the systems would be about equal if
>>>>>the 2600+ CPUs were each about as fast as the 3GHz Intels.
>>>>>
>>>>>Why not wait a few weeks for the newer AMD Opteron (also 64 bit)?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>How many weeks do we have to wait? Isn't it delayed already?
>
>
>
>
>What is it about the AMD Opteron that would make it considerably faster than the
>other AMD or Intel processor?

1 MB cache + memory controller on CPU + 64 Bits



This page took 0.03 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.