Author: Omid David Tabibi
Date: 14:45:45 04/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 19, 2003 at 17:22:19, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On April 19, 2003 at 16:28:46, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On April 19, 2003 at 16:15:33, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>Great we know that most of these programs are rated at least 2500, but what is >>>the lowest rated program that can still solve it. Is it BAM BAm or possibly >>>Movei or Chess Genius 3? >> >>You should define can solve it. > >Simply to select Ba3 is sufficient as long as the program understand that it >will be better off 10 or 11 moves later. > >I just let Chess Genius 3 to analyse the position under two/playes analysis, but >when I told it to print the moves analysis it simply froze> Now I saw that CG3 >selected the correct sequense of moves after Ba3 but too bad that I could NOT >manage to post its Analysis. > >>How much time? > >As long as it take Movei to solve it, but NOT more than 60 Minutes. Genesis solves this in 29 minutes on a 733 MHz system, at depth 15. > >>previous movei could solve it fast because it was happy with a draw >>but latest movei cannot do it because it prefers another move >>with score that is better than a draw during the search. >> >> >>Bam Bam is certainly the weakest of the programs that >>you mentioned. >> >>It is better if you give position that cannot be solved for >>the wrong reasons but even in that case the weakest program >>that can solve it tells you nothing because programmers can modify a program >>to solve a specific position but having weaker playing strength. >> >>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.