Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 15:32:04 04/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 19, 2003 at 17:45:45, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >On April 19, 2003 at 17:22:19, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On April 19, 2003 at 16:28:46, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On April 19, 2003 at 16:15:33, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>Great we know that most of these programs are rated at least 2500, but what is >>>>the lowest rated program that can still solve it. Is it BAM BAm or possibly >>>>Movei or Chess Genius 3? >>> >>>You should define can solve it. >> >>Simply to select Ba3 is sufficient as long as the program understand that it >>will be better off 10 or 11 moves later. >> >>I just let Chess Genius 3 to analyse the position under two/playes analysis, but >>when I told it to print the moves analysis it simply froze> Now I saw that CG3 >>selected the correct sequense of moves after Ba3 but too bad that I could NOT >>manage to post its Analysis. >> >>>How much time? >> >>As long as it take Movei to solve it, but NOT more than 60 Minutes. > >Genesis solves this in 29 minutes on a 733 MHz system, at depth 15. I just downloaded your program, it is a great piece of work ! http://www.cs.biu.ac.il/~davoudo/ >> >>>previous movei could solve it fast because it was happy with a draw >>>but latest movei cannot do it because it prefers another move >>>with score that is better than a draw during the search. >>> >>> >>>Bam Bam is certainly the weakest of the programs that >>>you mentioned. >>> >>>It is better if you give position that cannot be solved for >>>the wrong reasons but even in that case the weakest program >>>that can solve it tells you nothing because programmers can modify a program >>>to solve a specific position but having weaker playing strength. >>> >>>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.