Author: Vincent Lejeune
Date: 05:25:21 04/20/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 19, 2003 at 09:47:36, Vincent Lejeune wrote: > > >On April 19, 2003 at 09:44:52, Pavel Blokhine wrote: > >>On April 19, 2003 at 08:19:55, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >> >>>one more link, 11 pages, very slow server : >>> >>>http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/athlon64.html >>> >>>On April 19, 2003 at 07:46:47, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >>> >>>>No bad news this time, the opteron systems will be out the 21st of april !! >>>> >>>>http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=9039 >>>>http://www.amdzone.com/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>On April 19, 2003 at 01:02:15, Pavel Blokhine wrote: >>>> >>>>>On April 18, 2003 at 23:37:04, Brian Richardson wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On April 18, 2003 at 21:58:06, Jonas Bylund wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>Thanks. But so far, nobody has told me if it was a faster machine than the dual >>>>>>>>Xeon 2.8Ghz...which was the thing i wanted to know. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Yes dual AMD 2600+ would be faster. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Jonas >>>>>> >>>>>>I have a dual AMD system and the SMP scalability efficiency is at best about >>>>>>1.7x vs 1.9x for the Intel systems, IIRC, so the systems would be about equal if >>>>>>the 2600+ CPUs were each about as fast as the 3GHz Intels. >>>>>> >>>>>>Why not wait a few weeks for the newer AMD Opteron (also 64 bit)? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>How many weeks do we have to wait? Isn't it delayed already? >> >> >> >> >>What is it about the AMD Opteron that would make it considerably faster than the >>other AMD or Intel processor? > >1 MB cache + memory controller on CPU + 64 Bits + 16 registers 64 bits (instead of 8 for amd and intel 32 bits) + better internal architecture
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.