Author: Pavel Blokhine
Date: 07:46:28 04/20/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 20, 2003 at 08:25:21, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >On April 19, 2003 at 09:47:36, Vincent Lejeune wrote: > >> >> >>On April 19, 2003 at 09:44:52, Pavel Blokhine wrote: >> >>>On April 19, 2003 at 08:19:55, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >>> >>>>one more link, 11 pages, very slow server : >>>> >>>>http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/athlon64.html >>>> >>>>On April 19, 2003 at 07:46:47, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >>>> >>>>>No bad news this time, the opteron systems will be out the 21st of april !! >>>>> >>>>>http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=9039 >>>>>http://www.amdzone.com/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>On April 19, 2003 at 01:02:15, Pavel Blokhine wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On April 18, 2003 at 23:37:04, Brian Richardson wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On April 18, 2003 at 21:58:06, Jonas Bylund wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Thanks. But so far, nobody has told me if it was a faster machine than the dual >>>>>>>>>Xeon 2.8Ghz...which was the thing i wanted to know. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Yes dual AMD 2600+ would be faster. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Jonas >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I have a dual AMD system and the SMP scalability efficiency is at best about >>>>>>>1.7x vs 1.9x for the Intel systems, IIRC, so the systems would be about equal if >>>>>>>the 2600+ CPUs were each about as fast as the 3GHz Intels. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Why not wait a few weeks for the newer AMD Opteron (also 64 bit)? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>How many weeks do we have to wait? Isn't it delayed already? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>What is it about the AMD Opteron that would make it considerably faster than the >>>other AMD or Intel processor? >> >>1 MB cache + memory controller on CPU + 64 Bits >+ 16 registers 64 bits (instead of 8 for amd and intel 32 bits) + better >internal architecture What about the acutal processors speed? Will it be available in dual processors too?
This page took 0.03 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.