Author: stuart taylor
Date: 10:49:27 04/20/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 20, 2003 at 09:56:55, Jeroen van Dorp wrote: >On April 19, 2003 at 21:30:13, stuart taylor wrote: > > >>I really hope there will be some more serious responses also. > >So I understand that non-compliance with your opinions generally is "not >serious". > >Good. But tell me: why ask for responses in the first place when you're not >interested in other opinions? > >J. Actually I suppose I You answered Ok, but I was also pre-empting the kind of attitude which I was afraid might be accorded this thread, which would make it a long time before I can ask it again. And although I'm interested in why not, the main thing is why "yes", because it can always be switched off anyway. Why not is good to know, because then I actually see that people didn't miss my post, but that actually they wouldn't be interested in ANY (even authentic commentary) kind of chatter. However, what I was really hoping for was to pursuade some of the top programmers to make a really good job of it, and for that the first thing we need is positive public opinion regarding it. Anyway, I then went on to explain myself further, and no one has responded at all in a very intelligent way yet. S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.