Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: "Chatter" is very important.

Author: Sally Weltrop

Date: 18:35:38 04/20/03

Go up one level in this thread


On April 20, 2003 at 12:36:57, Jonas Bylund wrote:

>On April 19, 2003 at 19:49:37, stuart taylor wrote:
>
>>I mean, I believe it is important enough to be worked on. Some programs have a
>>"chatter" (or some other name), but It's not taken seriously enough IMO.
>> It DOES have applicability to position to a small extent e.g. when it says e.g.
>>"hey, you're touching my Queen", which might be true. And that shows that it
>>really could make comments even much more applicable also.
>>
>>  So PLEASE can it be done?
>>
>>I tend to feel that peoples pride gets in the way which stops the good players
>>from asking for this. It's too game-like and childish, which is basically true,
>>the way it's done. But they wouldn't admit that even THAT may have some benefits
>>of helping one focus on the game instead of surrounding distractions, and it's
>>also well known that a joking remark can stimulate the mind.
>> But it's a shame that when one tries to think into the comment, one normally
>>realises it was just a bluff or just a BIT too arbitrary, and it was really a
>>waste of time/effort to have even heard it. Nevertheless I have noticed that
>>many of the comments in chatter (with Fritz) HAVE been vaguely chosen to
>>represent the position on the board, which just makes a person listen for more,
>>when it is just sometimes hogwash, incidental, and indeed was merely a
>>distraction.
>>
>>  So, it should be done much better, and there should even be a choice of
>>chatters. One of them should attempt to be actually instructive and thought
>>provoking, and should inspire confidence that what is being said must be thought
>>into.
>>
>>Opinions? Comments? future plans?
>>
>>S.Taylor
>
>Personally the first thing i do is to switch of any chatter in any chess program
>since i want to be able to concentrate 100%. If you are familiar with my
>homepage/s you will know it is not because i don't like effects and animations,
>i just don't think they belong in a chess program that's it.

I am 100% agreement with u, first thing I do is the same thing, it's a novelty
but if u want a good game who care's about those things
>
>Jonas



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.