Author: Jonas Bylund
Date: 01:56:56 04/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
>Well, I suppose I'm not going to be getting my chess program with any >significantly improved, or instructional, intelligent type of chatter, in the >near future, as you are all mercilesely slamming what there is as well as what >ever could come from such a thing. >Therefore I'll probably just have to live without such a luxury existing on the >market. >I'm still not convinced it can't be good, or couldn't increase sales. >I think that anything genuine pays off handsomely. A programmer has to show a >finished product (i.e. with improvements). >S.Taylor I would like to add for the record that i have nothing against the idea of a chatter, especially if it was an intelligent chatter with some sort of AI algorithm. A place where i would love to see the chatter developed is in analysis and auto annotation, it sux at the moment in any chess program i have come across, but it is something i would be very into if it could be done right. I mean imagine if say Chessmaster could annotate as well as it can play :) or give advice at the same level as it plays! But until then i will turn of the "you touched my queen" (which is funny, but throws me off my game) chatter. Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.