Author: maria clara benedicto
Date: 04:57:26 04/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Kurt, all i can say, is thank you. regards maria On April 21, 2003 at 07:24:17, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On April 21, 2003 at 06:39:54, stuart taylor wrote: > >>I would say that if this result of atleast (over) 50% for all its matches is >>from every pre-planned test (and nothing was taken out because it didn't look >>good for Shredder 7.04, or if 50 games didn't give best result to it, and then >>another 50 being added etc) >, then I would conclude that Shredder 7.04 is clearly >>at the top of them all, in playing strength. Oh! sorry! I mean, as long as Fritz >>8008 (and the others) does less good on average than that. >> On second thought, therefore, it's not yet conclusive, (my verdict) if it >>wasn't all play all. >> But if yes, and Shredder still always keeps that minimum margin, then that's >>excellent, and my main question is............ >> >> Is that Shredder AS good in tactics AND/OR strategy/knowledge as the best of >>them, or is it still slightly weaker in one respect or more? >>S.Taylor > > Do you really think that we have cheated to prove something? I am indeed > disappointed about this statement. It looks as if you do not like at all > Shredder704 and would prefer to see another engine at top. We [Rolf Bühler > and myself are not testers for SMK or ChessBase] and our only interest is > to find out how strong the latest engines are, thus contributing a bit to > bring light in the jungle of computer chess. As to strategy/knowledge of > Shredder704 you can look a the CSS-WM-Test. > Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.