Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 15:24:45 04/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 21, 2003 at 18:09:03, Uri Blass wrote: >On April 21, 2003 at 17:18:46, Robin Smith wrote: > >>On April 20, 2003 at 17:20:11, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>It may be possible to use it in a productive way to avoid problems >>>that I mentioned(the program prefers loss by KR vs KPPP and not drawn KR vs KPP) >>>by having rules to trust tablebases scores only in part of the cases but I do >>>not like it. >> >>Uri, >> >>I know such things are possible in theory. Can you give an example of it >>actually happening? >> >>Robin > >No >If I remember correctly I saw a case when it happened but >I did not care to save the position and I do not plan >to look for it now. > >Uri [D] 8/8/8/7P/4K1P1/r6P/k7/8 b - - 0 1 Anaconda 1.0 lost this position with tablebases. It would take the pawn without. Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.