Author: Charles Worthington
Date: 15:58:08 04/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 20, 2003 at 10:06:01, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >On April 19, 2003 at 08:19:55, Vincent Lejeune wrote: > >>one more link, 11 pages, very slow server : >> >>http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/athlon64.html > >caution, may be this was a beta hardware : >http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=9046 > > >> >>On April 19, 2003 at 07:46:47, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >> >>>No bad news this time, the opteron systems will be out the 21st of april !! >>> >>>http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=9039 >>>http://www.amdzone.com/ >>> >>> >>> >>>On April 19, 2003 at 01:02:15, Pavel Blokhine wrote: >>> >>>>On April 18, 2003 at 23:37:04, Brian Richardson wrote: >>>> >>>>>On April 18, 2003 at 21:58:06, Jonas Bylund wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>Thanks. But so far, nobody has told me if it was a faster machine than the dual >>>>>>>Xeon 2.8Ghz...which was the thing i wanted to know. >>>>>> >>>>>>Yes dual AMD 2600+ would be faster. >>>>>> >>>>>>Jonas >>>>> Dual AMD 2600MP 64MB Hash Deepfritzmark Test Position = 2,053kN/s Dual 2.8 Xeon 64MB Hash Deepfritzmark Test Position = 2,209kN/s So...no it isn't faster... Charles >>>>>I have a dual AMD system and the SMP scalability efficiency is at best about >>>>>1.7x vs 1.9x for the Intel systems, IIRC, so the systems would be about equal if >>>>>the 2600+ CPUs were each about as fast as the 3GHz Intels. >>>>> >>>>>Why not wait a few weeks for the newer AMD Opteron (also 64 bit)? >>>> >>>> >>>>How many weeks do we have to wait? Isn't it delayed already?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.