Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is the opteron good, bad or ugly for computer chess programs?

Author: Matt Taylor

Date: 22:55:19 04/23/03

Go up one level in this thread


On April 22, 2003 at 14:40:22, Tom Likens wrote:

>On April 22, 2003 at 14:11:36, Ricardo Gibert wrote:
>
>>On April 22, 2003 at 12:43:50, Vincent Lejeune wrote:
>>
>>>more opteron reviews :
>>>
>>>http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20030422/index.html (overloaded server)
>>>http://www.theinquirer.net/
>>>
>>>
>>>Crafty sould take a big boost on the 64 bit opteron but it should be interreting
>>>to see how Shredder 7 work on a dual opteron too
>>>
>>
>>The following segment of the Aces Hardware review is certainly thought
>>provoking:
>>
>>http://www.aceshardware.com/read.jsp?id=55000265
>>
>>They make a "micro-benchmark" of 64 bit data operations (such as bitboards) that
>>is interesting, then a connect-4 benchmark. Both seem relevant to computer chess
>>and both make opteron look very good.
>
>Gee, what are the odds that the Intel compiler will ever be
>optimized for this??!! :(
>
>--tom

Likely if the rumors are true. Intel was considering x86-64 support in the
Pentium 5. It's all speculative, of course. If they do implement x86-64 in their
own processors, then you can expect to see it in the compiler.

-Matt



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.