Author: Harald Faber
Date: 00:49:55 04/25/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 24, 2003 at 03:02:05, Dann Corbit wrote: >After reading each of the biographies, I am convinced that each and every one >would be a terrific moderator. > >There are some different styles present, which is also good, I think. > >Really being a moderator is not so bad. I have done it several times and it >probably consumes less than two minutes a day (realistically). Of course, there >are those two or three days out of the year when you think "What was I thinking >when I volunteered to do this?" >;-) > >At any rate, I am really happy with the nominee group and think that those >chosen by the group will be absolutely terrific. All of the candidates seem >excellent to me. To be honest, I will not vote for any of them. If you'd been on the list, my vote had gone for you since you are the only person I 100% agree with your kind of moderation. Even the last moderator set only got one vote from me... However, moderation always worked and will work in future. It is just the HOW that matters.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.