Author: Tony Werten
Date: 03:40:57 04/25/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 25, 2003 at 03:49:55, Harald Faber wrote: >On April 24, 2003 at 03:02:05, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>After reading each of the biographies, I am convinced that each and every one >>would be a terrific moderator. >> >>There are some different styles present, which is also good, I think. >> >>Really being a moderator is not so bad. I have done it several times and it >>probably consumes less than two minutes a day (realistically). Of course, there >>are those two or three days out of the year when you think "What was I thinking >>when I volunteered to do this?" >>;-) >> >>At any rate, I am really happy with the nominee group and think that those >>chosen by the group will be absolutely terrific. All of the candidates seem >>excellent to me. > > >To be honest, I will not vote for any of them. If you'd been on the list, my >vote had gone for you since you are the only person I 100% agree with your kind >of moderation. Well... life would be kind of boring if you always had it 100% your way and things would never change. >Even the last moderator set only got one vote from me... >However, moderation always worked and will work in future. It is just the HOW >that matters. I'm pretty sure most of the nominees would be first time moderaters, so how can you know HOW they moderate ? Believe it or not, even Dan has been elected a first time. cheers, Tony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.