Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:08:14 04/26/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 26, 2003 at 09:07:09, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On April 25, 2003 at 16:57:22, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>On April 25, 2003 at 16:16:04, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On April 25, 2003 at 15:33:02, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >>> >>>>Hi Jorge >>>> >>>>It would be of much interest to repeat the same match at longer time controls, >>>>40'/40 or more. In that case, it could be that List504 could win the match. >>>> >>>>Kurt >>> >>>I might play another match of only 10 games at 90 minutes per side to get an >>>Idea. >>> >>>Jorge >> >> >> Hi Jorge >> This is a good idea. >> Kurt > >Last night I started a small match Fritz 5.32.0.1 vs List 5.04 at 60 min per >side and after 9 completed games List 5.04 is leading the match by 5 to 4. It >seems as if fritz 5.32 is better than List at shorter time control because it is >a faster searcher, but List get better than fritz at longer time control. > >Jorge I do not know You may be right that list is better than Fritz at long time control but I do not believe that the reason is the fact that Fritz prints bigger number of nodes. I have no knowledge of the amount of knowledge that Fritz5.32 and List5.04 have in the evaluation and I do not care about it because I cannot check it. Bigger number of nodes can be result of assembler optimization or different definition of nodes and it does not have result of less knowledge. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.