Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:09:28 04/26/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 26, 2003 at 10:08:14, Uri Blass wrote: >On April 26, 2003 at 09:07:09, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On April 25, 2003 at 16:57:22, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>On April 25, 2003 at 16:16:04, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>On April 25, 2003 at 15:33:02, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >>>> >>>>>Hi Jorge >>>>> >>>>>It would be of much interest to repeat the same match at longer time controls, >>>>>40'/40 or more. In that case, it could be that List504 could win the match. >>>>> >>>>>Kurt >>>> >>>>I might play another match of only 10 games at 90 minutes per side to get an >>>>Idea. >>>> >>>>Jorge >>> >>> >>> Hi Jorge >>> This is a good idea. >>> Kurt >> >>Last night I started a small match Fritz 5.32.0.1 vs List 5.04 at 60 min per >>side and after 9 completed games List 5.04 is leading the match by 5 to 4. It >>seems as if fritz 5.32 is better than List at shorter time control because it is >>a faster searcher, but List get better than fritz at longer time control. >> >>Jorge > >I do not know >You may be right that list is better than Fritz at long time control but I >do not believe that the reason is the fact that Fritz prints bigger number of >nodes. > >I have no knowledge of the amount of knowledge that Fritz5.32 and List5.04 have >in the evaluation and I do not care about it because I cannot check it. > >Bigger number of nodes can be result of assembler optimization or different >definition of nodes and it does not have result of less knowledge. > >Uri I meant does not have to be result of less knowledge but I clicked submit too fast. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.