Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 08:01:18 04/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 27, 2003 at 05:34:04, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On April 26, 2003 at 22:49:57, enrico carrisco wrote: > >>On April 26, 2003 at 14:16:14, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On April 26, 2003 at 12:27:28, Anson T J wrote: >>> >>>>I'm going to run a few games of blitz @ the time control 3mins + 2sec (inc) >>>> >>>>On a dual AMD XP2400+ is 128 MB hash sufficient for Deep Fritz 7? >>> >>>For Blitz of less than 30 Minutes 64 MB hash would be more efficient. >> >>Not necessarily true for these faster systems. Has someone tested performance >>regarding hash size with 2GHz+ machines? >> >>In the case of HIARCS, more hash does not inhibit performance. >> >>-elc. > >I have three computers a Celeron 450 Mhz, an Athlon 1200 GHz and a XP2800+ with >512 MB, but for Blitz of less than 30 Minutes, 64 MB hash run faster than using >128 MB. > >Jorge What metric are you using to measure speed? NPS or time to depth? NPS is not what you want to maximize.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.