Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 13:35:20 04/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 27, 2003 at 11:01:18, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On April 27, 2003 at 05:34:04, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On April 26, 2003 at 22:49:57, enrico carrisco wrote: >> >>>On April 26, 2003 at 14:16:14, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>On April 26, 2003 at 12:27:28, Anson T J wrote: >>>> >>>>>I'm going to run a few games of blitz @ the time control 3mins + 2sec (inc) >>>>> >>>>>On a dual AMD XP2400+ is 128 MB hash sufficient for Deep Fritz 7? >>>> >>>>For Blitz of less than 30 Minutes 64 MB hash would be more efficient. >>> >>>Not necessarily true for these faster systems. Has someone tested performance >>>regarding hash size with 2GHz+ machines? >>> >>>In the case of HIARCS, more hash does not inhibit performance. >>> >>>-elc. >> >>I have three computers a Celeron 450 Mhz, an Athlon 1200 GHz and a XP2800+ with >>512 MB, but for Blitz of less than 30 Minutes, 64 MB hash run faster than using >>128 MB. >> >>Jorge > > >What metric are you using to measure speed? > >NPS or time to depth? > >NPS is not what you want to maximize. I measure depth within certain seconds, for instance in 10 seconds what depth does it reach with 64 MB versus using 128 MB. Jorge
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.