Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 15:46:24 04/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 28, 2003 at 15:04:58, Keith Evans wrote: >On April 27, 2003 at 10:40:10, Aaron Gordon wrote: > >>>>timings, the ram would be still running UNDER spec. If you'd like to see for >>>>yourself, here is the PC2400XMS CL2 datasheet from Corsair. >>>> >>>>http://www.corsairmicro.com/main/products/specs/cm64sd256.pdf >>>> >>>>The numbers off of the dimm = CM64SD256-2400C2 >>>> >>>>If for some reason you'd like to see the DIMM, go here.. >>>>http://www.newageoc.com/pics2/corsair2400cl2.jpg >>> >>>Then the question remains, why did the manager apparently believe that something >>>would be operating out of spec? That corsair datasheet doesn't have enough >>>detail. See page 50 and associated diagrams in the following: >>> >>>http://download.micron.com/pdf/datasheets/dram/128Mx4x8x16DDR_D.pdf >> >>Running 150MHz CL2 ram at 133MHz CL2 isn't going to put it out of spec. > >Looking at the JPEG that you posted it looks like the part number for the Micron >DDR SDRAM is 46V16M8-75B. Without any "Z" after the "75". > >That part is not rated for 133 MHz CL2 operation, you need to run it with CL=2.5 >for 133 MHz. If you want CL=2 then lower the frequency to 100 MHz. > >This is from the cover sheet of the Micron specification which I posted. > >If there is a "Z" on the package after the "75" that I missed, then I agree with >you. Corsair is not Micron. Their datasheets are not the same.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.