Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 06:53:29 05/02/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 02, 2003 at 09:47:43, Uri Blass wrote: >In this case then I see no reason for the ssdf to test it. >I do not see what is interesting in seeing a program losing the same game in the >same way. The booklearning from (Chessbase) opponents isn't specifically orientated towards repeating winning lines indefinitely AFAIK. The exception being Gandalf. I also get the impression that the Ruffian book is wide and varied enough to avoid repetitions to a certain degree. >The ssdf should check if a program can lose the same game twice and refuse to >test programs that can do it. They could also have chosen to test Ruffian as a WinBoard engine. However, lack of learning is an engine "feature" which is tested as well as other parameters. Regards, Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.