Author: Matthias Gemuh
Date: 01:35:59 05/05/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 04, 2003 at 19:04:27, Uri Blass wrote:
>On May 04, 2003 at 17:56:36, Matthias Gemuh wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>Just mimmick positional style of BigLion !
>>No search depth needed :).
>
>Biglion does not shows better positional understanding than
>shredder in this game
>
>Shredder outserched it and even Biglion admitted that shredder was right when
>Biglion gave it almost 0.5 pawns advantage (it said Bc8 {[%eval 46,6])
>
>
>The fact that black is winning at this point is only luck.
>Biglion did not see that it was winning at the time that it happened and
>evaluated shredder as better.
>
Shredder 7.04 - BigLion 1.76 { 0-1 }
Look at position when they left book:
[D]r1r2bk1/1b1n1p1p/pq1p1np1/1p1Pp3/P3P3/BP1B1N1P/3N1PP1/R2QR1K1 w - - 0 22
Look at position 12 moves after book:
[D]2b1B1k1/5p1p/3p2pb/NPqPp3/4P3/2rn1N1P/5PP1/R4QK1 w - - 0 34
Has luck brought BigLion's pieces into these active positions in 12 moves ?
Who says BigLion did not see he is winning ?
Note that BigLion only tries to place its pieces well.
The rest happens automatically. He does not need to see anything in advance.
Shredder is better than BigLion, but not in this game.
/Matthias
>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.