Author: Matthias Gemuh
Date: 10:55:59 05/05/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 05, 2003 at 11:35:13, Uri Blass wrote:
>On May 05, 2003 at 04:35:59, Matthias Gemuh wrote:
>
>>On May 04, 2003 at 19:04:27, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>On May 04, 2003 at 17:56:36, Matthias Gemuh wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Just mimmick positional style of BigLion !
>>>>No search depth needed :).
>>>
>>>Biglion does not shows better positional understanding than
>>>shredder in this game
>>>
>>>Shredder outserched it and even Biglion admitted that shredder was right when
>>>Biglion gave it almost 0.5 pawns advantage (it said Bc8 {[%eval 46,6])
>>>
>>>
>>>The fact that black is winning at this point is only luck.
>>>Biglion did not see that it was winning at the time that it happened and
>>>evaluated shredder as better.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Shredder 7.04 - BigLion 1.76 { 0-1 }
>>
>>Look at position when they left book:
>>[D]r1r2bk1/1b1n1p1p/pq1p1np1/1p1Pp3/P3P3/BP1B1N1P/3N1PP1/R2QR1K1 w - - 0 22
>>
>>
>>Look at position 12 moves after book:
>>[D]2b1B1k1/5p1p/3p2pb/NPqPp3/4P3/2rn1N1P/5PP1/R4QK1 w - - 0 34
>>
>>Has luck brought BigLion's pieces into these active positions in 12 moves ?
>
>Yes
>
>It's evaluation was negative for itself after they got to their places so I
>suspect that with more time they will not get to these good places.
>
>Uri
The scores don't matter. He would have played same moves even with worse scores
and still won. Shredder's positional understanding was miserable in this game.
/Matthias.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.