Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:07:40 05/05/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 05, 2003 at 13:55:59, Matthias Gemuh wrote:
>On May 05, 2003 at 11:35:13, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On May 05, 2003 at 04:35:59, Matthias Gemuh wrote:
>>
>>>On May 04, 2003 at 19:04:27, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>
>>>>On May 04, 2003 at 17:56:36, Matthias Gemuh wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Just mimmick positional style of BigLion !
>>>>>No search depth needed :).
>>>>
>>>>Biglion does not shows better positional understanding than
>>>>shredder in this game
>>>>
>>>>Shredder outserched it and even Biglion admitted that shredder was right when
>>>>Biglion gave it almost 0.5 pawns advantage (it said Bc8 {[%eval 46,6])
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>The fact that black is winning at this point is only luck.
>>>>Biglion did not see that it was winning at the time that it happened and
>>>>evaluated shredder as better.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Shredder 7.04 - BigLion 1.76 { 0-1 }
>>>
>>>Look at position when they left book:
>>>[D]r1r2bk1/1b1n1p1p/pq1p1np1/1p1Pp3/P3P3/BP1B1N1P/3N1PP1/R2QR1K1 w - - 0 22
>>>
>>>
>>>Look at position 12 moves after book:
>>>[D]2b1B1k1/5p1p/3p2pb/NPqPp3/4P3/2rn1N1P/5PP1/R4QK1 w - - 0 34
>>>
>>>Has luck brought BigLion's pieces into these active positions in 12 moves ?
>>
>>Yes
>>
>>It's evaluation was negative for itself after they got to their places so I
>>suspect that with more time they will not get to these good places.
>>
>>Uri
>
>
>
>The scores don't matter. He would have played same moves even with worse scores
>and still won. Shredder's positional understanding was miserable in this game.
>
>/Matthias.
The moves of shredder reduced the score of biglion so it seems that biglion
believed that shredder moves were good during the game.
Is this a result of root processing by biglion or maybe biglion scores could go
down even lower after possible different moves that lion considered as more
logical?
Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.