Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:51:38 05/05/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 05, 2003 at 16:52:59, Peter Berger wrote: >On May 05, 2003 at 16:44:38, Richard Pijl wrote: > >>>[D]8/1p1k4/4p2p/1PP2pp1/2KP4/7P/6P1/8 w - - 0 1 >>> >>>This is a draw (I hope ;) ). >>>Peter >> >>The Baron doesn't seem to agree on that: >> >> 14(45). 1856 509122289 298 d4d5 e6d5 c4d5 d7c7 d5e6 f5f4 e6f5 c7d7 f5g6 >>h6h5 g6g5 d7e8 g5h5 e8f7 c5c6 f4f3 c6b7 > >No doubt. Fritz even has +5 after more than an hour of search - as I explained, >computers don't understand this motive. But I am pretty sure I am right :) > >It's much easier to understand for a human. > >A sample line: > >1. d5 e5! 2. b6 e4 3. Kd5 h5 4. g4 fxg4 5. fxg4 h4 and the draw is quite >obvious. > >Peter 3.Kd5 and 5.fxg4 are illegal moves. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.