Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 11:52:24 05/06/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 06, 2003 at 12:03:34, Ed Schröder wrote: >On May 06, 2003 at 07:34:13, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >You said: > >>if rebel would be a chessbase engine, >>all the years where the CB company threw mud on Ed Schröder > >This is not true. > >Ed do you really believe CSS would have done ALL THIS if the 2 guys in charge (Dieter Steinwender & Frederic Friedel) would not have been deeply involved in computerchess business TOO ? Do you think a magazin that reports about a topic has an interest to write negative or insulting about people or people's products ? only if there is a mix between own money interests and writing the problems occur. this is what i mean. CSS was better in the early years. In the moment Frederic started making his deals with all kind of companies, saitek, H+G, and build CB with Matthias, the things and direction in CSS completely changed. before that, it was a good magazine. BTW: ICCA changed too for the same reasons: commercial interests of the board of the ICCA. Shall i name the people and their deals/their profit to make it more understandable ?!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.