Author: Magoo
Date: 16:24:23 05/06/03
After making alot of functions to macros and alot of other stuff, my program is much faster!! Perft 5 (without evaluating nodes) gives: Depth:5, Nodes:5072212, Time:63 sec, Nps:80511, Value:0 But!! I know other programs (i been looking at mscp and faile) do this at least 6 times faster, (that is perft 5 < 10sec). I've looked at the source for the programs i compare with, especially faile does alot of stuff in the move_generator, mine is smaller, maybe a few more if statments. Now, if i only could figure out why it is so slow, it shouldn't be!! Flat profile: Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds. % cumulative self self total time seconds seconds calls s/call s/call name 66.51 42.12 42.12 5087588 0.00 0.00 move_generator 6.58 46.29 4.17 5087588 0.00 0.00 all_moves_legal 6.57 50.45 4.16 125595698 0.00 0.00 push 6.19 54.37 3.92 135333428 0.00 0.00 look 3.65 56.68 2.31 5087587 0.00 0.00 undo_move 3.21 58.71 2.03 5087587 0.00 0.00 do_move 2.42 60.24 1.53 53339218 0.00 0.00 hist_score2 1.33 61.08 0.84 1 0.84 63.33 perft_doit 1.06 61.75 0.67 10175154 0.00 0.00 do_passant 1.03 62.40 0.65 20519350 0.00 0.00 get_zobrist_piece 0.32 62.60 0.20 2945541 0.00 0.00 score_cap 0.27 62.77 0.17 5294191 0.00 0.00 pop 0.22 62.91 0.14 5087587 0.00 0.00 pop_hist 0.21 63.04 0.13 5087587 0.00 0.00 look_hist 0.14 63.13 0.09 5087588 0.00 0.00 new_moves 0.11 63.20 0.07 5087588 0.00 0.00 free_move_list 0.11 63.27 0.07 5087587 0.00 0.00 push_hist 0.08 63.32 0.05 5087850 0.00 0.00 getToMove 0.02 63.33 0.01 169002 0.00 0.00 do_material_getval 0.00 63.33 0.00 5506 0.00 0.00 new_move_with_passant 0.00 63.33 0.00 2 0.00 0.00 chess_board
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.