Author: Juan Pablo Naar
Date: 21:13:15 05/07/03
Go up one level in this thread
Maybe youre using fritz 8.0.0.19 or .23 that are versions very buggy. Hiarcs 8, well, maybe youre using the fake hiarcs 9 instead :-) Ruffian have always shown good blitz results about LG, hmmmm, maybe it has played vs the weaker engines Shredder 7: Im not surprised, the same goes for The King My advice is: dont judge any engine by only playing a few games, 10 games are not enough to test engines. Juan Pablo Naar On May 07, 2003 at 23:43:41, Peter Stayne wrote: >I'm running a large tournament on my secondary pc atm (32 engines: Ruffian >1.0.1, LG2000v3.9, DJ7, Anmon 5.21, Shredder 7.04, CT15, Dragon 4.4.3, Crafty >19.03, Pharaon 2.62, Tao 5.4, Sjeng 12.13, yace paderborn, SOS.3, Comet B60, >Amy0.8, ArasanX6.3, The King SKR, Anaconda 1.0, Goliath Light 1.5, Nejmet 3.06, >List 504, Pepito 1.59, Fritz 8, Knightdreamer3.1f, Hiarcs 8, Exchess 4.03, >Taktix, Doctor 3.0, Biglion, Inmichess3.06n, BamBam, Faile 1.4.4) at 5'+5" time >controls (10 rounds, 4960 games) and am getting very odd results after 159 >games) > >A1200, 1.5gb PC133 RAM, 32MB Hashes, remis.ctg > >1. Fritz 8 and Hiarcs 8 are 23rd and 25th, respectively. >2. Comet B60 is 14th, Ruffian and LG are tied for 1st. >3. Shredder is 5th, and The King is 17th. >4. I've seen Fritz 8 lose on time, and when it plays white, there seems to be a >3 or so second lag after black moves to when fritz starts thinking. > >Now I know it's still early, but they have all played 10 games, and things don't >seem to be getting any closer to the results one would expect from the strong >engines doing poorly. > >Any thoughts as to things I should look at as far as setup is concerned that may >cause weirdness like this? > >Pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.