Author: Slobodan R. Stojanovic
Date: 11:36:13 05/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 08, 2003 at 16:19:14, Richard Pijl wrote: >On May 08, 2003 at 15:47:46, Slobodan R. Stojanovic wrote: > >>On May 08, 2003 at 10:01:40, Richard Pijl wrote: >> >>However, the sequence is almost correct: >>1.Nxf7, Kxf7 2.g4 Bh7 3.Qxe6+ Ke8 4.Qf7+ Kd8 5.Rhe1 >> >>This one should be estimated wining for white: >>r2k2nr/ppqnbQpb/2p4p/8/2BP2P1/2N5/PPPB1P1P/2KRR3 b - - 0 5 >> >>Test Baron now. I have found 5...g5 6.d5 cxd5 7.Bxd5 and now the win should be explicite. Sl. > >At your service :-) > >This time at an AMD 2000+ MP (single CPU version, with a slightly modified >version (in passed pawn evaluation) compared to this afternoon): > > ply time nodes score pv > > 4(10). 0 17152 11 g7g5 f2f4 d8c8 e1e7 > 5(13)& 0 30652 11 g7g5 f2f4 d8c8 e1e7 g8e7 > 5(13). 0 58203 11 g7g5 f2f4 d8c8 e1e7 g8e7 > 6(15)& 0 143005 -13 g7g5 f2f4 b7b5 f4g5 h6g5 f7g7 e7f6 > 6(15). 1 249960 -13 g7g5 f2f4 b7b5 f4g5 h6g5 f7g7 e7f6 > 7(17)> 4 982975 -47 c7h2 > 7(17)& 5 1190060 -47 c7h2 c4e6 h2d6 d4d5 c6c5 c3b5 d6a6 > 7(19). 11 2410980 -47 c7h2 c4e6 h2d6 d4d5 c6c5 c3b5 d6a6 > 8(20)& 17 3826117 -55 c7h2 c3e4 g8f6 e1h1 h2h1 d1h1 h7e4 f7g7 > 8(21)> 20 4550029 -54 g7g5 > 8(23). 52 11523534 -55 g7g5 d4d5 a7a6 d5c6 b7c6 f2f4 g5f4 d2f4 > 9(27)- 207 46419085 -90 g7g5 d4d5 c6c5 c3b5 c7h2 d5d6 e7d6 f7e8 > 9(27)& 218 48958243 -106 g7g5 d4d5 c6d5 c4d5 a7a6 f2f4 a8b8 f4f5 c7h2 >c3e2 > 9(27)> 236 53230858 -105 c7d6 > 9(27)& 238 53600117 -102 c7d6 e1e6 d6b4 c4b3 b4d4 c3d5 d4c5 d5e7 > 9(27). 308 69066908 -102 c7d6 e1e6 d6b4 c4b3 b4d4 c3d5 d4c5 d5e7 > 10(26)& 384 85564785 -123 c7d6 e1e6 d6d4 d2h6 d4c4 e6e7 c4f7 d1d7 d8c8 >d7c7 c8d8 e7f7 g8h6 > 10(28)> 409 91357883 -122 g7g5 > >The Baron sees advantage for white, but the win is just too deep. > >>Sl.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.