Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 02:29:23 05/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 09, 2003 at 06:25:43, Uri Blass wrote:
>On May 09, 2003 at 06:00:14, K. Burcham wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> [D] 6R1/8/2P5/3K4/1P1PpP1P/p1p1P1P1/rpPp3N/qbbrkBB1 w - - 0 1
>>
>>Chess Tiger 14.0:
>>
>>1.c7 Bxc2 2.c8Q b1Q 3.Qh3 Qb3+ 4.Ke5 Qd5+ 5.Kxd5 Bb3+ 6.Kc5 c2 7.Bf2+ Kxf2
>>8.Qg2+ Ke1 9.Qe2#
>> +- (#9) Depth: 13 00:00:03 2384kN
>>1.c7 Bxc2 2.c8Q b1Q 3.Qh3 Qb3+ 4.Ke5 Qd5+ 5.Kxd5 Bb3+ 6.Kc5 c2 7.Bf2+ Kxf2
>>8.Qg2+ Ke1 9.Qe2#
>> +- (#9) Depth: 14 00:00:05 3632kN
>>1.c7 Bxc2 2.c8Q b1Q 3.Qh3 Qb3+ 4.Ke5 Qd5+ 5.Kxd5 Bb3+ 6.Kc5 c2 7.Bf2+ Kxf2
>>8.Qg2+ Ke1 9.Qe2#
>> +- (#9) Depth: 15 00:00:08 6020kN
>>1.c7 Bxc2 2.c8Q b1Q 3.Qh3 Qb3+ 4.Ke5 Qd5+ 5.Kxd5 Bb3+ 6.Kc5 c2 7.Bf2+ Kxf2
>>8.Qg2+ Ke1 9.Qe2#
>> +- (#9) Depth: 16 00:00:14 11067kN
>>1.c7 Bxc2 2.c8Q b1Q 3.Qh3 Qb3+ 4.Ke5 Qd5+ 5.Kxd5 Bb3+ 6.Kc5 c2 7.Bf2+ Kxf2
>>8.Qg2+ Ke1 9.Qe2#
>> +- (#9) Depth: 17 00:00:25 19553kN
>>1.c7 Bxc2 2.c8Q b1Q 3.Qh3 Qb3+ 4.Ke5 Qd5+ 5.Kxd5 Bb3+ 6.Kc5 c2 7.Bf2+ Kxf2
>>8.Qg2+ Ke1 9.Qe2#
>> +- (#9) Depth: 18 00:00:45 34822kN
>>1.c7 Bxc2 2.c8Q b1Q 3.Qh3 Qb3+ 4.Ke5 Qd5+ 5.Kxd5 Bb3+ 6.Kc5 c2 7.Bf2+ Kxf2
>>8.Qg2+ Ke1 9.Qe2#
>> +- (#9) Depth: 19 00:01:19 60304kN
>>1.c7 Bxc2 2.c8Q b1Q 3.Qh3 Qb3+ 4.Ke5 Qd5+ 5.Kxd5 Bb3+ 6.Kc5 c2 7.Bf2+ Kxf2
>>8.Qg2+ Ke1 9.Qe2#
>> +- (#9) Depth: 20 00:02:22 108339kN
>>
>>kburcham
>
>I suspect that it is too easy to be mate in 9 and my position was right when the
>translation to english was wrong.
>
>It is possible that I did a mistake in translation to english but not in
>the setup position but for some reason I have problem in getting into the
>relavant link at this moment.
>
>Uri
[Event "Shootout (Fritz8, Blitz:05'+3") "]
1. c7 {#10/13 9} Bxc2 {-3.47/11 2} 2. c8=Q {#8/9 2} b1=Q {#7/9 1} 3. Qh3 {
#7/9 1} Qb3+ {#6/8 0} 4. Ke5 {#6/8 0} Qe6+ {#5/7 0} 5. Kxe6 {#5/6 0} Bb3+ {
#4/6 0} 6. Kf6 {#4/6 0} c2 {#3/5 0} 7. g4 {(Qg2) #3/4 0} Qxd4+ {#2/4 0} 8. exd4
{#2/3 0} e3 {(Bxg8) #1/2 0} 9. Qxe3# {#1/2 0} 1-0
It is strange but Fritz 8 first indicate that it will be Mate in 10 moves, but
it turned out to be in 9 moves.
Jorge
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.