Author: Slater Wold
Date: 10:45:18 05/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 10, 2003 at 10:05:40, Michael P. Nance Sr. wrote: >On May 09, 2003 at 20:28:04, Peter Stayne wrote: > >>I doubt it'll be a year. While AMD has neglected the MP's ever since the opteron >>buzz started, AMD's archaic 760MPX chipset cannot continue past 2800+. I'll give >>it MAX 6 months. Or... by that time, Opterons of the equivalent of the 3000+ at >>the higher bus speeds with the upcoming nForce3 chipset will be available at >>consumer prices, making the MP's irrelevant. >> >>pete >> >>On May 09, 2003 at 19:37:27, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>On May 09, 2003 at 16:59:59, Michael P. Nance Sr. wrote: >>> >>>>On May 09, 2003 at 15:18:23, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>> >>>>>http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,110484,00.asp >>>>Could You please tell Me when You think one of the Motherboard Manufactors will >>>>come out with a board that will support twin(dual)3000+ Processors?I want to >>>>build a Dual with twin 3000+Processors. Everyone I have contacted have told Me >>>>They have nothing yet to support twin 3000+'s.How long do You think it might be >>>>before the Motherboard I need come out or is available?>>>>Mike >>> >>>A year for the 333 bus. >>> >>>And you can quote me. >So the best a 760mpx chipset can handle is a 2800+ Processor? Yes. 266mhz fsb. >Why do You think >the Opterons will make the mp(duals)irrelevant? I have no idea. But they won't. Will this Opterons replace the >>Mp's for use in dual configuration or just as a singal Processor just out >proforming the mp's. Opterons are going to be mid to high range server CPUs. The MPs are defined as 'entry level servers and high-end workstations'. They have nothing to do with each other. Both target a completly different audience. >Your comments will be appreciated.>>>>Mike
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.