Author: J. Wesley Cleveland
Date: 10:28:32 05/11/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 10, 2003 at 07:24:25, Bo Persson wrote:
>On May 08, 2003 at 16:23:45, Anthony Cozzie wrote:
>
>>On May 08, 2003 at 14:51:15, Ricardo Gibert wrote:
>>
>>>http://www.aceshardware.com/#65000417
>>>
>>>They post results for both 32 bit and 64 bit binaries for a single cpu. What's
>>>funny is the crafty section of the benchmark does not seem to benefit from 64
>>>bit very much. Go figure.
>>>
>>>Also, the Athlon 3000+ still has the best result for the crafty section of the
>>>benchmark regardless.
>>>
>>>What's going on?
>>
>>uhh, spec int 2k != crafty
>>
>>Yes, crafty is in it, but there are about 20 other programs . . .
>>
>>Remember the Opteron is a *server* chip. Its designed for database/transaction
>>processing workloads, which have a very different flavor than spec.
>
>No, not really. *Server* chip just means *expensive*.
>
>Intel also always launches new chips "for advanced server use", meaning "for
>prople with a big budget".
>
>
The crafty score is 1562, which is pretty good. See
http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/res2003q2/cpu2000-20030421-02093.html
It is compiled with SuSE optional package gcc33 with these flags.
+FDO: PASS1=-fprofile-arcs PASS2=-fbranch-probabilities
Portability:
PORTABILITY=-DSPEC_CPU2000_LP64 is applied to all benchmarks.
186.crafty: EXTRA_CFLAGS=-DLINUX_i386
Does someone know if these are the best flags for 64 bit crafty ?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.