Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Take a look at the position in the Chessbase website !

Author: Jorge Pichard

Date: 23:56:01 05/12/03

Go up one level in this thread


On May 12, 2003 at 17:56:11, Uri Blass wrote:

>On May 12, 2003 at 16:47:19, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote:
>
>>Shredder doesn't even consider the insipid h3 move.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Shredder 7.04 -AMD 1500Mhz 512 MB RAM 128 MB Hash
>>2b2rk1/Rp5p/3pPqpQ/2nP4/4pp2/8/P1RN1PPP/6K1 w - - 0 1
>>
>>Analysis by Shredder 7.04:
>>
>>1.Qxf8+ Kxf8
>>  -+  (-2.68)   Depth: 1/2   00:00:00
>>1.Qxf8+ Kxf8
>>  -+  (-2.43)   Depth: 1/2   00:00:00
>>1.Rxc5 dxc5
>>  ³  (-0.63)   Depth: 1/2   00:00:00
>>1.Rxc5 dxc5
>>  ²  (0.34)   Depth: 1/2   00:00:00
>>1.Rxc5 dxc5 2.Nxe4
>>  +-  (3.89)   Depth: 1/3   00:00:00
>>1.Nc4
>>  +-  (4.82)   Depth: 1/3   00:00:00
>>1.Nc4
>>  +-  (4.82)   Depth: 1/3   00:00:00
>>1.Nc4 Bxe6 2.Nxd6
>>  +-  (4.31)   Depth: 2/4   00:00:00
>>1.Nc4 Qa1+ 2.Rc1 Qxc1#
>>  -+  (-#2)   Depth: 2/4   00:00:00
>>1.Nc4 Qa1+ 2.Rc1 Qxc1#
>>  -+  (-#2)   Depth: 2/4   00:00:00
>>1.Qxf8+ Kxf8 2.Rxc5
>>  -+  (-#2)   Depth: 2/4   00:00:00
>>1.Qxf8+ Qxf8 2.Nc4
>>  -+  (-2.24)   Depth: 2/8   00:00:00
>>1.Rxc5 Qa1+ 2.Nf1 dxc5
>>  µ  (-0.72)   Depth: 2/8   00:00:00
>>1.Rxc5 Qa1+ 2.Nf1 dxc5
>>  =  (0.25)   Depth: 2/8   00:00:00
>>1.Rxc5 Qa1+ 2.Rc1 Qxc1+ 3.Nf1
>>  ±  (1.39)   Depth: 2/8   00:00:00
>>1.f3 Bxe6
>>  +-  (1.79)   Depth: 2/8   00:00:00
>>1.f3 Qd4+ 2.Kf1
>>  +-  (2.24)   Depth: 2/8   00:00:00
>>1.f3 Qd4+ 2.Kh1 Qxd5
>>  +-  (2.48)   Depth: 2/8   00:00:00
>>1.Rc4 Nxe6
>>  +-  (2.59)   Depth: 2/8   00:00:00
>>1.Rc4 Bxe6 2.dxe6 Qxe6
>>  +-  (3.07)   Depth: 2/8   00:00:00
>>1.Rc4 Bxe6 2.dxe6 Qxe6
>>  +-  (3.79)   Depth: 2/8   00:00:00
>>1.Rc4 Qe5 2.Qg5 Qxg5
>>  +-  (3.54)   Depth: 3/8   00:00:00
>>1.Rc4 Qe5 2.a4 Qxd5
>>  +-  (3.04)   Depth: 3/8   00:00:00
>>1.Rc4 Qe5 2.f3 Qxd5 3.fxe4 Qxd2
>>  +-  (2.79)   Depth: 3/8   00:00:00
>>1.Rc1 Qd4 2.Nc4 Qxd5
>>  +-  (2.83)   Depth: 3/8   00:00:00
>>1.Rc1 Qe5 2.Nb3 Qxd5 3.Nxc5 dxc5
>>  +-  (2.89)   Depth: 3/9   00:00:00
>>1.Nb3 Bxe6 2.dxe6 Nxb3
>>  +-  (2.95)   Depth: 3/9   00:00:00
>>1.Nb3 Bd7 2.exd7 Nxd7
>>  +-  (3.58)   Depth: 3/9   00:00:00
>>1.Nb3 Nxe6 2.dxe6 Qxe6
>>  +-  (4.34)   Depth: 3/10   00:00:00
>>1.Nb3 Qe5 2.Qxh7+ Kxh7 3.Rxb7+ Bxb7
>>  +-  (4.09)   Depth: 4/11   00:00:00
>>1.Nb3 Qe5 2.Qxh7+ Kxh7 3.Rxb7+ Bxb7
>>  +-  (3.59)   Depth: 4/12   00:00:00
>>1.Nb3 Bd7 2.exd7 Qa1+ 3.Nxa1
>>  +-  (3.59)   Depth: 4/12   00:00:00
>>1.Nb3 Qe5 2.Rd2 Nd3 3.Qg7+ Qxg7
>>  +-  (3.34)   Depth: 5/12   00:00:00
>>1.Nb3 Qe5 2.Rc1 Qxd5 3.e7 b6
>>  +-  (3.34)   Depth: 5/16   00:00:00
>>1.Nb3 Qe5 2.Rc1 Qxd5 3.e7 Re8 4.Nxc5 dxc5
>>  +-  (3.47)   Depth: 6/17   00:00:01  47kN
>>1.Nb3 Qe5 2.Rc1 e3 3.fxe3 fxe3 4.Rxc5 dxc5 5.Qxg6+ hxg6
>>  +-  (3.22)   Depth: 7/19   00:00:01  87kN
>>1.Nb3 Qe5 2.Rc1 e3 3.Nxc5 exf2+ 4.Kf1 Qh5 5.Qxh5
>>  +-  (3.22)   Depth: 7/21   00:00:01  100kN
>>1.h4 Qe5 2.h5 Nxe6 3.dxe6 gxh5
>>  +-  (3.23)   Depth: 7/24   00:00:01  175kN
>>1.h4 Qe5 2.h5 gxh5 3.Nc4 Qxd5 4.e7
>>  +-  (3.31)   Depth: 7/24   00:00:01  188kN
>>1.h4 Qe5 2.h5 gxh5 3.Nc4 Qxd5 4.Qxf4 Rxf4
>>  +-  (3.06)   Depth: 8/24   00:00:01  224kN
>>1.h4 Qe5 2.Qg5 Qa1+ 3.Nf1 Qb1 4.Rd2 f3 5.e7
>>  +-  (3.05)   Depth: 8/24   00:00:01  290kN
>>1.h4 Qf5 2.Qg5 Bxe6 3.dxe6 Nxe6 4.Qxf5 Rf6 5.Qxf6
>>  +-  (3.26)   Depth: 9/26   00:00:03  712kN
>>1.h4 Qe5 2.Qg5 Qa1+ 3.Nf1 f3 4.g3 Qd4 5.e7 Re8 6.Ne3
>>  +-  (3.08)   Depth: 10/28   00:00:06  1737kN
>>1.h4 Qe5 2.h5 gxh5 3.Nc4 Qxd5 4.e7 Qd1+ 5.Kh2 Re8 6.Nxd6 Rxe7 7.Rxc5 Rg7
>>  +-  (3.33)   Depth: 11/30   00:00:14  3819kN
>>1.h4 Qf5 2.Qg5 Bxe6 3.dxe6 Qxe6 4.Nc4 e3 5.Nxe3 fxe3 6.Qxe3 Qxe3
>>  +-  (3.33)   Depth: 11/31   00:00:17  4918kN
>>1.h4 Qa1+ 2.Nf1 Qf6 3.Rc4 f3 4.g3 Qf5 5.Ne3 Qh3 6.Rb4 Bxe6 7.dxe6 Qxe6
>>  +-  (3.30)   Depth: 12/34   00:00:32  8770kN
>>1.h4 Qa1+ 2.Nf1 Qf6 3.Qg5 Kg7 4.Nd2 Qa1+ 5.Kh2 Kg8 6.e7 Re8 7.Nc4 Qd1 8.Rc3 Na4
>>  +-  (3.33)   Depth: 13/38   00:00:58  15847kN
>>1.h4 Qd4 2.e7 Re8 3.Qxf4 Bf5 4.g4 Nd3 5.Qe3 Qa1+ 6.Nf1 Bxg4 7.Rxb7 Nc5 8.Ra7 Qf6
>>9.Qg3 Bf3
>>  +-  (3.25)   Depth: 14/44   00:02:25  40635kN
>>
>>(Frohlick, Albuquerque 12.05.2003)
>
>I even did not look at the position because I know that white was in big trouble
>in the relevant position but now I see based on the score
>that Jorge gave the wrong position(the position when h3 was suggested was worse
>for white based on analysis of computers and no move could give a score of more
>than +3 for white in computer analysis).
>
>Uri

http://www.chessbase.com/columns/column.asp?pid=160



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.