Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Are computers stronger at 40/2hours compared to 3min/move?

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 14:23:47 05/14/03

Go up one level in this thread


On May 14, 2003 at 14:59:17, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On May 14, 2003 at 14:53:58, J. C. Boco wrote:
>
>>I've been musing about different computers, both dedicated and software for
>>PC's.  I've recently had a new thought which I'm sure is old-stuff to all of you
>>veterans out there.
>>
>>I usually play with the level setting which states the average response time for
>>the computer to make one move.  For example let's say the level is "3 minutes on
>>average for each move".
>>
>>But I could achieve the same time control by setting the computer up for 40
>>moves in 2 hours, and let the computer budget its time.
>>
>>While I can see that the time control of 40/2hours may make the machine a little
>>stronger since it can search deeper (longer) in hairy positions, just how much
>>stronger will it get?
>>
>>My lay guess is the 40/2hours time control is not much stronger than the 1 move
>>every (on average) 3 minutes.  Does anyone have any insight?
>
>Depends on how you look at it.  At slow time controls computers will play better
>and have fewer mistakes.
>
>However, the ratings for computer programs are much higher at fast game rates,
>and the faster the time control the higher the rating.
>
>Imagine playing game in 10 seconds and you can imagine why.

He does not talk about faster time control.

3 minutes/move is the same average time per move like 2 hours/40 moves.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.