Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 02:33:21 05/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 14, 2003 at 18:53:05, Peter Berger wrote: >Or maybe neither? > >I have only looked at the analysis of game 5, move 16 so far. Let's try with >Huebner's mainline: > >16. g3 Nh2+ 17. Kf2 Ng4+ 18. Ke1 Qh3 19. Rg1 Nd7 20. e4 dxe4 21. Nxe4 Qh2 22. >Rf1 Qg2 23. Bc1 > >Here Huebner only gives 23. ...Nh2 when 23. ...Nf6 looks like a clear >improvement IMHO and I think if someone has problems it isn't black. I have >analyzed this position for some time with the help of the Fritz chessengine. > >This is a position Kasparov had to consider when choosing his 16th move or >taking the draw instead, and if there really is no advantage for white here, it >means that Huebner, a great analyzer, couldn't find anything promising after >_weeks_ of analysis passed. I can't see the point you are trying to make. Are you saying that if FRITZ gave 23... Nf6 and huebner gives only 23...Nh2, that then huebner after several months of analysis must have a hole in his thinking? Somehow that would astonish me. But wait please, I must analyse it with FRITZ myself before I can give you a final verdict. :)) > >Peter
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.