Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Rebel victory over humans, why not Chessbase Engines?

Author: Kim Walters

Date: 14:06:44 05/15/03

Go up one level in this thread


On May 15, 2003 at 16:26:46, Derek Paquette wrote:

>Here is a question I'd like to share with all of you,
>I was reading over the rebel site, and I was SHOCKED to see that rebel is
>beating up GM's and super grandmasters left right and center,
>http://www.rebel.nl/edindex.htm
>
>look at rebel vs...down the left side.   These were done in 1999, on crappy
>processors that our processors laugh at today.  They didn't have 8 processors
>and 2 gigabytes of ram.  So the question is,  what is going on here?
>
>Maybe emphasis is put too much on the results of computer vs computer to pick a
>computer 'champion'  in man vs machine, instead of results vs humans?
>
>If i were to choose a program 'company' to honestly and aggressively make a
>program to beat the best in the world, i would put my money on Rebel
>
>Opinions?
\



I agree with you wholeheartedly Rebel Century 4 in particular is a Class Act
Engine



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.