Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Rebel victory over humans, why not Chessbase Engines?

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 14:22:30 05/15/03

Go up one level in this thread

On May 15, 2003 at 17:16:00, Ryan B. wrote:

>It's all in the marketing...  If Rebel were a chessbase engine it would be
>rightfully recognized as the strongest engine around.

Rebel is a strong engine but we have no evidence for your claim.

People play games with Rebel and we do not see proof that it is the strongest.
It could not score more than 50% against shredder7.04 and scored 1/2 point less
than 50% against Fritz in Kurt's games.

Uri

• Re: Rebel victory over humans, why not Chessbase Engines? Kurt Utzinger 01:15:59 05/16/03
• Re: Rebel victory over humans, why not Chessbase Engines? Thorsten Czub 00:47:50 05/16/03
• Re: Rebel victory over humans, why not Chessbase Engines? Ryan B. 14:33:38 05/15/03
  • Re: Rebel victory over humans, why not Chessbase Engines? Uri Blass 15:00:04 05/15/03
    • Re: Rebel victory over humans, why not Chessbase Engines? Roger Brown 07:02:45 05/16/03
    • Re: Rebel victory over humans, why not Chessbase Engines? Ryan B. 15:57:55 05/15/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.