Author: Peter Berger
Date: 07:22:48 05/16/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 15, 2003 at 18:50:51, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >Oh, excuse me... Do you really want to challenge Huebner? I didn't mean to challenge Huebner. I challenged his analysis. >Either you are someone >else under pseudonym or you are impostering. And you want to explain that the >opening with gxf6 is a good move in the game? I must admit I didn't have the >time to look at it. Very convincing argument ;) >But Huebner surely had the time and IF gxf6 would be a >boomer he certainly wouldn't have given NxNf6 and NxN in his analysis. Just IMO >of course. But Huebner is allegedly only the best German player, ok, if we >forget some who came from elsewhere after 1989. And he certainly would not >oversee such a possibility that _you_ could find after an analysis with FRITZ. >Ok so far or do you want to claim some higher status, higher than Huebner? :) > I got taken away because of my interest in this game, else I would certainly not have started to discuss it with you. IMHO analysis is a product of time, effort and ability. It is very likely that I spent much more time and effort on analysis of the 16. g3 position than Huebner, which might make up for some of my defiencies when it is about abilities, although I spent less time on the sideline we discussed. Shortly after the end of the game a friend of mine and me started to play it out after 16. g3 - I took the black pieces first in a friendly game on ICC and lost against the exact line given by Huebner. Then I challenged him to play a correspondence game and we have been analyzing and playing this one since March, although he chose a different way to try and win with 19. Nd1 this time because he found problems with the Huebner line. In preparation we had a look at most analysis published by other masters, too, and we found several mistakes in them. Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.