Author: blass uri
Date: 02:53:25 10/16/98
Go up one level in this thread
On October 16, 1998 at 04:38:50, Kai Lübke wrote: >Hi all, > >with just one game to go with the programs I have so far, the standings in the >Shep Championship 1998 III (40/120 on two PII-400, 128 MB) are as follows: > >1. Chess Tiger 11.5 4,5 >2. Chessmaster 5555 3,5* > Nimzo 98 Paderborn 3,5 >4. MChess Pro 8.0 3,0** >5. Junior 5.0 2,5* >6. Fritz 5.01 2,0 >7. Virtual Chess II 1,0 >------------------------- > Hiarcs 7.0 > Rebel 10.0 > Chessmaster 6000 > >* the game between Chessmaster and Junior was adjourned yesterday with an >advantage for Junior, it will be finished today. >** MChess played its games so far with "dynamic TB access" activated which is >discouraged by Marty. It's likely it would have played better without it. I read in your site that it would have play better in endgames. The question is if it is relevant to the middle game For example for the game between Junior5 and Mchess8 I think that Junior won it in the middle game and not in the endgame (when there are queen and rook and many pawns against 2 rooks and knight and many pawns I do not call the position an endgame). Did mchess use TB of 4-5 pieces endgames before it saw that it is losing in this game? Uri > >Get all the details and CBV/PGN coverage at http://come.to/SCCS or >http://sccs.8m.com. > >--- >Shep
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.