Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:29:24 05/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
On May 18, 2003 at 14:01:58, Mike Byrne wrote: >5"/G Secane, PA USA 2003 > > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 >1 Fritz 8 ** 11 01 ½1 11 0½ 11 01 01 ½1 1½ ½0 14.5/22 >2 Junior 7 00 ** 01 ½1 ½1 11 ½1 00 1½ 01 11 11 14.0/22 >3 CM8 The King 10 10 ** ½0 0½ ½1 10 ½1 11 ½1 ½0 1½ 12.5/22 131.25 >4 Crafty 19.03 Nimzovich ½0 ½0 ½1 ** 1½ 00 1½ 1½ ½½ 1½ ½1 1½ 12.5/22 128.25 >5 The King 00 ½0 1½ 0½ ** ½1 1½ ½1 10 10 11 1½ 12.5/22 126.00 >6 Crafty 19.03 Morphy 1½ 00 ½0 11 ½0 ** ½0 ½½ ½1 ½1 11 01 12.0/22 >7 Chess Tiger 15.0 00 ½0 01 0½ 0½ ½1 ** ½1 1½ 10 01 ½1 10.5/22 >8 Crafty 19.03 Lasker 10 11 ½0 0½ ½0 ½½ ½0 ** 0½ 10 ½½ ½1 10.0/22 >9 Crafty 19.03 ST 10 0½ 00 ½½ 01 ½0 0½ 1½ ** ½1 10 0½ 9.0/22 98.00 >10 Crafty 19.03 WB ½0 10 ½0 0½ 01 ½0 01 01 ½0 ** ½1 10 9.0/22 96.75 >11 Crafty 19.03 Capablanca 0½ 00 ½1 ½0 00 00 10 ½½ 01 ½0 ** 11 8.0/22 >12 Crafty 19.03 Petrosian ½1 00 0½ 0½ 0½ 10 ½0 ½0 1½ 01 00 ** 7.5/22 > >I was only doing this to test modified versions of Crafty. CT 15 results >surprized me -- not sure why it did perform up to expectations. CM8K (standard) >performed very well here. The King is CM9K standard. Crafty 19.03 ST is >standard crafty. > >One interesting aspect of Crafty is that modifying certain values only slightly >tend to influence results. Before, I would modify crafty variables greatly with >often disasterous results. IMO, the defualt Crafty variables in 19.03 are very >close to optimal and one shout not vary these values too much. I was very >please with Crafty Nimzovich here. > >Next post will have the games in PGN format. What about your 120/40 tournament? Did you begin it? I can send new movei if you did not do it but I read no news from you about it. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.